Tag Archive for: M&A PR

The short answer is yes. But the more useful answer is: it depends on when, for whom, and what you’re trying to accomplish. Consumer brands tend to think of thought leadership as a nice-to-have, something you do when you have extra budget and a slow news cycle. I’ve seen that assumption cost companies real money.

There are three moments in a consumer brand’s lifecycle when thought leadership stops being optional. When you’re raising money. When you’re heading toward an exit, whether that’s an IPO or an acquisition. And right now, when AI is reshaping how investors, analysts, and acquirers form their first impression of your brand before they ever open your deck.

When You’re Raising: Share of Voice Is a Growth Signal

At the Series A and Series B stage, founders tend to think the work is all product: penetration, iteration, opening new channels. That’s the baseline. That’s what investors expect. The brands that command higher valuations and better multiples have done something beyond that. They’ve built marketplace authority.

Owning conversations in your category, showing up consistently in earned media, building share of voice: these aren’t vanity metrics. Research published in WARC by strategist James Hankins demonstrates that share of search is one of the most accurate proxies for market share available, holding true across categories from CPG to automotive to SaaS, with category-level R² correlations above 0.6 at 95% confidence. And per the Excess Share of Voice principle, documented across more than 4,000 brands in Millward Brown research: when your share of voice exceeds your market share, you grow. When it doesn’t, you decline.

Investors know this. When a brand has clear marketplace authority, the brand itself has value. That’s where higher multiples come from. It’s not just a product story anymore. It’s a market position story.

AI Is Now the First and Last Pass in Due Diligence

Something has shifted in how deals get evaluated, and most consumer brands haven’t caught up to it yet. AI tools are now part of due diligence. Not as a novelty, but as actual workflow.

Before an analyst or deal team ever opens your pitch deck, someone has run your brand through ChatGPT or Perplexity. A quick AI search adds context about whether your deck is worth the time. At the back end of the process, when deeper questions are being asked about credibility, category leadership, and product integrity, AI is used again. It’s the filter at the door and the closing argument.

That means your brand needs to show up clearly in AI-generated responses. Not just mentioned. Positioned. Investors and deal teams want to see that you’re understood as a category leader, that your product philosophy is legible, that the brand is credible. If AI can’t answer basic questions about your company with confidence, that’s a signal. And not a good one.

I see this in how our clients are evaluated. The brands with clear narrative penetration in AI search create fewer friction points in the deal process. The ones who show up inconsistently, or not at all, create doubt. Doubt slows deals down, and sometimes even stops them.

Pre-IPO: You’re Not Convincing One Deal Team. You’re Convincing a Market.

An IPO creates a different kind of complexity. You’re not managing one set of decision makers. You have investors, customers, and potentially regulators, and they don’t all want the same thing.

Investors want consistent growth, clean financials, and a brand with a defensible position. Customers want something different. They want to know that going public won’t degrade the product they love, that the company will continue to act in alignment with their values, that they’ll actually benefit in some way from the brand’s success. There are moments when investor needs and customer needs are in direct tension.

But here’s how I think about resolving that tension: if your customers are happy, if you’re acquiring new ones and retaining existing ones, brand investments stay defensible. Customer loyalty is an investor argument. You don’t have to choose between the two audiences if your PR strategy is built correctly.

What that requires is two distinct but aligned strategies running in parallel. For investors, you need strong financials and PR financial storytelling, executed within regulatory constraints. For customers, you need marketing and PR working together to meet them where they are and tell the right story consistently. These can’t be siloed. Narrative leakage happens when the investor story and the customer story are pulling in different directions. And by the time you notice it, the damage is already done.

There’s a Regulatory Window and Most Brands Miss It

Pre-IPO consumer brands have a window. There’s considerably more latitude to tell your story in the 12 months before an IPO than there is once you’re in the quiet period or have filed. The story you build during that time needs to match the story that adds value during the IPO itself. Consistency between those two phases isn’t optional. It’s scrutinized.

And you cannot get the regulatory piece wrong. For many consumer brands, especially those in wellness, food, or any category with product claims, there’s an additional layer beyond standard IPO compliance. The FTC, FDA, and category-specific regulatory bodies are paying attention. A cease and desist from a regulatory body will blow an IPO faster than almost anything else. The risk isn’t theoretical. I’ve watched it happen.

The brands that execute this well start early. They build the narrative deliberately, they stay within bounds, and they make sure every public-facing message during that window is calibrated for where they’re going, not just where they are.

What Actually Creates the Valuation Story

I’ve worked with a consumer wellness brand that achieved 300% stock growth at IPO. What made the difference wasn’t one brilliant PR move. It was integration.

They went from a largely manual manufacturing operation to one that was almost fully automated. They got there by becoming one of the top 3 brands in their sector first. And they did it by committing fully: PR, content, SEO, smart industry sponsorship, celebrity spokespersons, deep investment in their local market. They didn’t lean on any one tactic. They built a plan and they executed it at every level.

Because it was genuinely integrated, every channel elevated the others. The PR made the content more credible. The SEO made the PR more findable. The sponsorships reinforced the brand positioning that everything else was building. That’s how you create a valuation story. Not by doing one thing well, but by doing everything in alignment.

The brands that go into a raise or an exit underprepared are the ones that treated thought leadership as a campaign. Something you turn on when you need it. By the time you need it, you’re already behind.

The best time to build the narrative was 18 months ago. The second best time is now.

Ready to Build Your Brand’s Authority Before You Need It?

If you’re a venture-backed consumer brand preparing for a raise, an IPO, or an acquisition, the narrative you build today directly affects the valuation you command tomorrow. Start with an assessment of where you stand, with an experienced PR partner.

Claim Your Narrative. Request an assessment

Sources:

  1. James Hankins, “Share of Search: The Most Important Metric You’ve Never Heard Of,” WARC, January 2021.
  2. Millward Brown brand study via BrightEdge, “Understanding Share of Voice in Digital Markets.”
  3. Cometly, “What Is Share of Voice: The Complete Guide,” January 2026.

The Invisible Asset, written by Avaans Media founder Tara Coomans, is the PR ROI framework that builds brand equity, drives valuation, attracts capital, and wins high-stakes moments. It’s built for CMOs defending budgets, CEOs preparing for a capital event, and operators in regulated categories. Get the book →

Most CFOs spend years preparing the financials for an exit. The cap table is clean. The audits are done. The EBITDA story is tight. But there’s a valuation driver that doesn’t live in the data room, and it’s the one that gets negotiated hardest: the narrative.

This isn’t soft. It’s strategic. And if you’re 12 to 24 months out from a liquidity event, you’re already behind if you haven’t started.

What “Narrative Strategy” Actually Means in M&A Context

Narrative strategy isn’t branding. It’s not a tagline or a PR campaign. In the context of an exit, it’s the deliberate construction and ownership of how your company is understood by the people who determine your multiple: buyers, PE sponsors, strategic acquirers, and the analysts who advise them.

The market already has a story about your company. You either wrote it, or someone else did. A strong narrative strategy means you wrote it, you’ve seeded it across the right media channels, and by the time a buyer’s team starts their diligence, the story they find confirms the story you’re telling. That alignment directly affects price.

Why This Shows Up in Valuation

Here’s what the data says: According to Ocean Tomo’s Intangible Asset Market Value Study, intangible assets now constitute approximately 92% of S&P 500 market capitalization, up from 68% in 1995. Brand, reputation, and perceived category leadership sit squarely inside that intangible bucket.

In M&A transactions, buyers don’t just buy revenue, they buy confidence in future revenue. And confidence is a narrative problem before it’s a financial one. If a buyer’s team can’t clearly articulate what makes your company defensible, differentiated, and category-relevant, they price in the uncertainty. That uncertainty comes out of your multiple.

Strategic acquirers pay premium prices for companies whose narratives are coherent and already resonating in the market. Category creators get acquired at higher multiples than followers. That’s not an accident. That’s narrative at work.

The 3 Narrative Assets CFOs Should Audit Before an Exit

Before you can build, you need to know what you have. Here are the 3 narrative assets that show up in deal conversations.

  • 01 Executive Thought Leadership: Where is your CEO, your CTO, or your leadership team showing up in Earned Media? Are they quoted in the trades your buyers read? Do they own a point of view in your category? Thought Leadership in deal environments functions as proof of category relevance. If your team isn’t visible in the right outlets, the buyer assumes you’re a smaller player than your financials suggest.
  • 02 Earned Media Positioning: Not all press is equal. Tier 1 Earned Media in industry-specific and business publications creates a paper trail that buyers actually check. This is distinct from paid placements and sponsored content. Earned coverage signals third-party validation, which reduces perceived risk in a transaction.
  • 03 Category Narrative Ownership: Can someone search your space and find your company not just as a vendor, but as a voice? Companies that own the category conversation in their niche command a different kind of attention from strategic buyers looking to acquire market position, not just revenue.

The AI Diligence Layer Most CFOs Don’t See Coming

Here’s what’s changed in the last two years: buyers don’t just have analysts running your reputation audit anymore. They have AI doing it first.

Modern due diligence tools use machine learning and NLP to scan news, social media, and public coverage simultaneously, flagging reputational risks that can directly impact brand value and future growth. Sentiment scores get calculated. Media footprints get mapped. Executive visibility gets graded. And all of it happens before a human analyst reads a single document in your data room.

This changes the stakes considerably. A buyer’s AI layer isn’t looking for a highlight reel. It aggregates data from financial statements, news reports, and third-party audits to build a comprehensive picture, flagging financial inconsistencies, legal liabilities, and reputational concerns in the same pass. Your narrative and your numbers get evaluated together.

New Risk: AI Reputation Audits

Before a human analyst opens your data room, AI tools are already building an intelligence profile of your company from public sources. Narrative gaps, inconsistent messaging, and executive invisibility all get flagged. What AI finds first shapes how buyers read everything that follows.

But there’s a second AI layer that almost no one in the CFO seat is thinking about yet: what large language models say about your company when a buyer’s team asks them.

LLMs prioritize information from authoritative, frequently updated sources when generating responses. Organizations that maintain comprehensive, current digital footprints across multiple channels tend to be represented more accurately. External validation from recognized authorities, including positive mentions in industry publications and by thought leaders, carries direct weight in how AI characterizes companies.

In plain terms: if your CEO isn’t showing up as an authority in your category, AI tells buyers that. If your narrative is thin or inconsistent across channels, AI reflects that back too. And if your competitors have been more active in Earned Media, the AI models a buyer consults will position them as the category leaders. Not you.

Auditing how major AI systems represent your organization has become as essential as traditional media monitoring. That means systematically querying systems like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude about your company, your products, and your leadership to identify potential misrepresentations before buyers find them first. This isn’t theoretical. It’s the new first impression. And it’s built entirely from the narrative you’ve put into the world over the last 18 to 24 months.

When to Start (And Why Most Companies Wait Too Long)

The biggest mistake is treating narrative strategy as a pre-close sprint. You cannot build credible Thought Leadership in 90 days. Earned Media placements take months to develop, pitch, and place. And category narrative ownership requires a sustained presence that actually predates the deal process.

The right window is 18 to 24 months before a target close. That timeline gives you enough runway to build a media presence, establish executive authority, and create the kind of search footprint that holds up under diligence, including the AI layer that now runs before any human opens your data room.

If you’re already inside 12 months, you’re not out of options. But you need to move fast and be strategic about where you focus. Not every outlet moves the needle with every buyer type. A PE sponsor reads different publications than a strategic acquirer in your category. Your PR engagement has to be mapped to your buyer profile.

What Buyers Are Actually Looking For

Modern M&A teams run comprehensive media and reputation audits before LOI. They’re looking at how the CEO has positioned the company publicly, whether the brand narrative is consistent across channels, what analysts and journalists say about the category, and whether there are any reputation gaps that create integration risk.

Inconsistency is flagged. Silence is flagged. And a narrative that contradicts the financial story is a red flag that slows deals or adjusts terms. The companies that close fastest and at the highest multiples have narratives that do diligence work before the data room opens.

What CFOs Can Do Right Now

Start with an honest audit. Pull every Earned Media hit from the last 24 months. Map it against your buyer profile. Look for gaps in Thought Leadership visibility and category narrative ownership. Then query the major AI platforms and see how they describe your company, your leadership, and your category. What you find is what buyers find.

Then assess whether your current PR engagement is strategic, meaning it’s tied to business milestones and outcomes, or just active. Activity-based PR is noise. Strategic narrative building is a valuation asset.

If you’re serious about maximizing your exit, narrative strategy isn’t a marketing conversation. It belongs in the CFO’s exit planning process alongside the financial audit, the legal clean-up, and the management presentation.

The story you tell before the deal is the story that sets the price.

Claim your narrative before someone else does.  Avaans Media works with growth-stage and pre-exit companies on strategic narrative positioning. Every strategy begins with a Fingerprint Strategy: a comprehensive strategic diagnostic specific to your market position, narrative leverage, competitive landscape, and business goals. The output is not a press calendar. It is clarity.

Request an Assessment →

Sources:

  1. Ocean Tomo / J.S. Held, Intangible Asset Market Value Study (2025 update). Stat cited: 92% of S&P 500 market cap is intangible assets. oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study
  2. RTS Labs, AI in Due Diligence: What It Is and How It’s Transforming M&A (2025). Source for AI sentiment analysis and reputation flagging in diligence workflows. rtslabs.com/ai-due-diligence
  3. Grata, AI Due Diligence in M&A (2024). Source for AI data aggregation across financial and reputational sources. grata.com/resources/ai-due-diligence
  4. StatusLabs, AI and the Future of Reputation Management (White Paper, 2025). Source for LLM behavior around authority signals, digital footprints, and third-party validation. statuslabs.com

 

 

Blogarama - Blog Directory